
The Monet to Picasso exhibition @ UMFA was the highlight of my week. My friends and I waited for about 20 minutes in line to get in. And I had never seen the UMFA so crowded as that day.
While looking at the paintings, I realized that back then the artists used people they personally knew as the subject for the work. The portraits usually featured someone's wife or a friend, or the artist's mistress, etc. What was intriguing to me was the personal connection inherent to the paintings, there's always a story behind the well painted face. For example, one painting was a portrait of a store owner that the artist knew, and the description mentioned that the artist tried to save the store owner from bankruptcy. There's another one that featured one of Picasso's mistresses while on vacation. I am starting to think one of the reasons Picasso had so many lovers could be that women were the inspirations for his work. Anyways, it's interesting to note that contemporary art has gone commercial and switched to using paid models for painting and drawing. I wonder if using a non-personal subject would take away some of the "soul" in a piece of art work. Too bad I didn't see the exhibit with an artist to pose that question.
A bonus to the exhibit was free appetizers and desserts (cream puffs reminiscent of Beard Papas) served for us the students. :) I didn't know Gouda cheese tasted so good with plain bread.
